z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Understanding shock dynamics in the inner heliosphere with modeling and Type II radio data: The 2010‐04‐03 event
Author(s) -
Xie H.,
Odstrcil D.,
Mays L.,
St. Cyr O. C.,
Gopalswamy N.,
Cremades H.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2011ja017304
Subject(s) - heliosphere , physics , coronal mass ejection , interplanetary spaceflight , shock (circulatory) , solar wind , coronagraph , astrophysics , plasma , stars , medicine , quantum mechanics , exoplanet
The 2010 April 03 solar event was studied using observations from STEREO SECCHI, SOHO LASCO, and Wind kilometric Type II data (kmTII) combined with WSA‐Cone‐ENLIL model simulations performed at the Community Coordinated Modeling Center (CCMC). In particular, we identified the origin of the coronal mass ejection (CME) using STEREO EUVI and SOHO EIT images. A flux‐rope model was fit to the SECCHI A and B, and LASCO images to determine the CME's direction, size, and actual speed. J‐maps from STEREO COR2/HI‐1/HI‐2 and simulations from CCMC were used to study the formation and evolution of the shock in the inner heliosphere. In addition, we also studied the time‐distance profile of the shock propagation from kmTII radio burst observations. The J‐maps together with in‐situ data from the Wind spacecraft provided an opportunity to validate the simulation results and the kmTII prediction. Here we report on a comparison of two methods of predicting interplanetary shock arrival time: the ENLIL model and the kmTII method; and investigate whether or not using the ENLIL model density improves the kmTII prediction. We found that the ENLIL model predicted the kinematics of shock evolution well. The shock arrival times (SAT) and linear‐fit shock velocities in the ENLIL model agreed well with those measurements in the J‐maps along both the CME leading edge and the Sun‐Earth line. The ENLIL model also reproduced most of the large scale structures of the shock propagation and gave the SAT prediction at Earth with an error of ∼1 ± 7 hours. The kmTII method predicted the SAT at Earth with an error of ∼15 hours when using n 0 = 4.16 cm −3 , the ENLIL model plasma density near Earth; but it improved to ∼2 hours when using n 0 = 6.64 cm −3 , the model density near the CME leading edge at 1 AU.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here