z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Initial results from a dynamic coupled magnetosphere‐ionosphere‐ring current model
Author(s) -
Pembroke Asher,
Toffoletto Frank,
Sazykin Stanislav,
Wiltberger Michael,
Lyon John,
Merkin Viacheslav,
Schmitt Peter
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2011ja016979
Subject(s) - physics , ionosphere , magnetohydrodynamics , geophysics , magnetosphere , plasmasphere , computational physics , convection , ring current , mechanics , plasma , field line , earth's magnetic field , magnetic field , quantum mechanics
In this paper we describe a coupled model of Earth's magnetosphere that consists of the Lyon‐Fedder‐Mobarry (LFM) global magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) simulation, the MIX ionosphere solver and the Rice Convection Model (RCM) and report some results using idealized inputs and model parameters. The algorithmic and physical components of the model are described, including the transfer of magnetic field information and plasma boundary conditions to the RCM and the return of ring current plasma properties to the LFM. Crucial aspects of the coupling include the restriction of RCM to regions where field‐line averaged plasma‐ β ≤ 1, the use of a plasmasphere model, and the MIX ionosphere model. Compared to stand‐alone MHD, the coupled model produces a substantial increase in ring current pressure and reduction of the magnetic field near the Earth. In the ionosphere, stronger region‐1 and region‐2 Birkeland currents are seen in the coupled model but with no significant change in the cross polar cap potential drop, while the region‐2 currents shielded the low‐latitude convection potential. In addition, oscillations in the magnetic field are produced at geosynchronous orbit with the coupled code. The diagnostics of entropy and mass content indicate that these oscillations are associated with low‐entropy flow channels moving in from the tail and may be related to bursty bulk flows and bubbles seen in observations. As with most complex numerical models, there is the ongoing challenge of untangling numerical artifacts and physics, and we find that while there is still much room for improvement, the results presented here are encouraging.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here