
Compositional trends of Icelandic basalts: Implications for short–length scale lithological heterogeneity in mantle plumes
Author(s) -
Shorttle O.,
Maclennan J.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.928
H-Index - 136
ISSN - 1525-2027
DOI - 10.1029/2011gc003748
Subject(s) - peridotite , basalt , geology , mantle (geology) , partial melting , mid ocean ridge , geochemistry , mid atlantic ridge , mantle plume , icelandic , lithosphere , ridge , paleontology , tectonics , linguistics , philosophy
Lithological variations in the mantle source regions under mid‐ocean ridges and ocean islands have been proposed to play a key role in controlling melt generation and basalt composition. Here we combine compositional observations from Icelandic basalts and modeling of melting of a bilithologic peridotite‐pyroxenite mantle to demonstrate that, while short–length scale major element variation is present in the mantle under Iceland, source heterogeneity does not make an important contribution to excess melt production. By identifying the major element characteristics of end‐member Icelandic melts, we find enriched melts to be characterized by low SiO 2 and CaO, but high FeO. We quantitatively compare end‐member compositions to experimental partial melts generated from a range of lithologies, pressures and melt fractions. This comparison indicates that a single source composition cannot account for all the major element variation; depleted Icelandic melts can be produced by depleted peridotite melting, but the major element composition of enriched melts is best matched by melting of mantle sources that have been refertilized by the addition of up to 40% mid‐ocean ridge basalt. The enriched source beneath Iceland is more fusible than the source of depleted melts, and as such will be overrepresented in accumulated melts compared with its abundance in the source. Modeling of peridotite‐pyroxenite melting, combined with our observational constraints on the composition of the Icelandic mantle, indicates that crustal thickness variations in the North Atlantic must be primarily due to mantle temperature and flow field variations.