
The effect of hydrothermal alteration on the seismic structure of the upper oceanic crust: Evidence from Holes 504B and 1256D
Author(s) -
Carlson R. L.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.928
H-Index - 136
ISSN - 1525-2027
DOI - 10.1029/2011gc003624
Subject(s) - geology , hydrothermal circulation , oceanic crust , crust , upper crust , seismology , geochemistry , geophysics , subduction , tectonics
It has long been argued but never demonstrated that alteration “fronts” should be recognizable features of the seismic structure of the oceanic crust. The abrupt transition from crust affected by low‐temperature hydrous alteration to crust affected by high‐temperature hydrothermal alteration must arise from a stepwise reduction of porosity and permeability that should correspond to a seismic boundary. In Holes 504B and 1256D, the sudden downhole appearance of hydrothermal minerals corresponds to a increase of the velocity gradient that is caused by a change of porosity within the lava‐dike transition zone, and models of the downhole variation of permeability computed from apparent porosity logs show a corresponding stepwise change of permeability (by a factor of ∼20) that is sufficient to account for the onset of hydrothermal alteration. In principle, the coincidence of the seismic structure with the alteration boundary can be used to interpret the seismic structure of the oceanic crust. In particular, the onset of hydrothermal alteration proves to be a viable candidate for the transition from Layer 2A to Layer 2B, which also occurs within or near the lava‐dike transition zone. There is also a systematic decrease of permeability with increasing sonic velocity in both the lavas and the dikes (log(κ) ∼ a + bv). Remarkably, the extrapolated trend for the lavas is in excellent agreement with in situ permeabilities measured in very young crust, ranging in age from zero to 3.5 Ma. To a good approximation, the permeability of Layer 2A can be estimated from its seismic structure.