z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Modeling heat transfer from a convecting, crystallizing, replenished silicic magma chamber at an oceanic spreading center
Author(s) -
Liu Lei,
Lowell Robert P.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.928
H-Index - 136
ISSN - 1525-2027
DOI - 10.1029/2011gc003612
Subject(s) - geology , magma chamber , silicic , magma , convection , heat transfer , caldera , petrology , volcano , geophysics , geochemistry , mechanics , physics
Most hydrothermal systems at oceanic spreading centers are underlain by basaltic magma bodies; however, some are underlain by higher‐silica magmas such as andesite or dacite. The different viscosity of the latter magmas, which results from their higher SiO 2 content, lower liquidus and solidus temperatures, and higher water contents, affects the rate of heat transport from these magmas, and the behavior of the overlying hydrothermal system. We construct viscosity models for andesite and dacite melts as a function of temperature and water content and incorporate these expressions into a numerical model of thermal convective heat transport from a high Rayleigh number, crystallizing, replenished axial magma chamber (AMC) beneath a hydrothermal circulation system. Simulations comparing the time‐dependent heat flux from dry basalt, 0.1 wt.% H 2 O andesite, 3 wt.% H 2 O andesite, and 4 wt.% H 2 O dacite indicate that higher‐viscosity magmas convect less vigorously, resulting in lower heat flux, possibly lower vent temperatures, and a slower decay rate of the heat flux. Hydrothermal systems driven by unreplenished high‐silica melts may have slightly longer lifetimes than those driven by basalt; however, vent temperature and heat output decay on decadal time scales. Magma replenishment at a rate of ∼10 −8 –10 −7 m/s across the base of the AMC can maintain relatively stable heat output between ∼10 7 –10 9 Watts and typical hydrothermal vent temperatures. Such replenishment rates are not likely to result from buoyancy‐driven melt transport by porous flow through the lower crust, especially for high‐viscosity magmas such as andesite and dacite.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here