Premium
Numerical evaluation of subsurface soil water evaporation derived from sensible heat balance
Author(s) -
Sakai Masaru,
Jones Scott B.,
Tuller Markus
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/2010wr009866
Subject(s) - evaporation , soil water , soil thermal properties , soil science , silt , sensible heat , thermal conduction , environmental science , latent heat , water balance , front (military) , hydraulic conductivity , hydrology (agriculture) , materials science , geotechnical engineering , geology , atmospheric sciences , thermodynamics , composite material , geomorphology , oceanography , physics
A recently introduced measurement approach allows in situ determination of subsurface soil water evaporation by means of heat‐pulse probes (HPP). The latent heat component of subsurface evaporation is estimated from the residual of the sensible heat balance. This heat balance method requires measurement of vertical soil temperature and estimates of thermal properties for soil water evaporation determination. Our objective was to employ numerically simulated thermal and hydraulic processes using constant or diurnally cycled surface boundary conditions to evaluate and understand this technique. Three observation grid spacings, namely, 6 mm (tri‐needle HPP), 3 mm (penta‐needle HPP) and 1 mm, along with three soil textures (sand, silt, and silty clay) were used to test the heat balance method. The comparison of heat balance–based evaporation rate estimates with an independent soil profile water balance revealed substantial errors when thermal conductivity was averaged spatially across the evaporation front. Since the conduction component of heat flux is the dominant process at the evaporation front, the estimation of evaporation rate was significantly improved using depth‐dependent instead of a space‐averaged . A near‐surface “undetectable zone” exists, where the heat balance calculation is irreconcilable, resulting in underestimation of total subsurface evaporation. The method performs better for medium‐ and coarse‐textured soils than for fine‐textured soils, where portions of the drying front may be maintained longer within the undetectable zone. Using smaller temperature sensor spacing near the soil surface minimized underestimation from the undetectable zone and improved accuracy of total subsurface evaporation rate estimates.