z-logo
Premium
Quantifying watershed sensitivity to spatially variable N loading and the relative importance of watershed N retention mechanisms
Author(s) -
Gardner Kristin K.,
McGlynn Brian L.,
Marshall Lucy A.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/2010wr009738
Subject(s) - watershed , environmental science , riparian zone , hydrology (agriculture) , time of concentration , base flow , land cover , watershed area , land use , drainage basin , ecology , geology , geography , computer science , habitat , geotechnical engineering , machine learning , cartography , biology
The link between watershed nitrogen (N) loading and watershed nitrate (NO 3 − ) export is poorly understood yet critical to addressing the growing global problem of watershed N enrichment. We introduce the Big Sky nutrient export model (BiSN) which incorporates spatial stream water chemistry, data from instream tracer additions and geologic weathering experiments, and terrain and land use analysis to quantify the spatial variability of watershed sensitivity to N loading and the relative importance of upland, riparian, and instream N retention (storage, removal, or transformation) across land use/land cover (LULC) and landscape positions. Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods were used for model specification and were helpful in assessing model and parameter uncertainty and advancing understanding of the primary processes governing watershed NO 3 − export. Modeling results revealed that small amounts of wastewater loading occurring in watershed areas with short travel times to the stream had disproportionately large impacts on watershed nitrate (NO 3 − ) export compared to spatially distributed N loading or localized N loading in watershed areas with longer travel times. In contrast, spatially distributed N inputs of greater magnitude (terrestrial storage release and septic systems) had little influence on NO 3 − export. During summer base flow conditions, 98%–99% of watershed N retention occurred in the uplands, most likely from biological assimilation or lack of hydrologic transport. The relative role of instream N retention increased with N loading downstream through the stream network. This work demonstrates the importance of characterizing the spatial variability of watershed N loading, export and retention mechanisms, and considering landscape position of N sources to effectively manage watershed N.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here