z-logo
Premium
An assessment of the nonmarket benefits of the Water Framework Directive for households in England and Wales
Author(s) -
Metcalfe Paul J.,
Baker William,
Andrews Kevin,
Atkinson Giles,
Bateman Ian J.,
Butler Sarah,
Carson Richard T.,
East Jo,
Gueron Yves,
Sheldon Rob,
Train Kenneth
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/2010wr009592
Subject(s) - nonmarket forces , water framework directive , contingent valuation , valuation (finance) , directive , european union , scope (computer science) , preference , geography , environmental resource management , environmental science , willingness to pay , business , economics , water quality , ecology , computer science , statistics , mathematics , accounting , factor market , programming language , market economy , biology , microeconomics , economic policy
Results are presented from a large‐scale stated preference study designed to estimate the nonmarket benefits for households in England and Wales arising from the European Union Water Framework Directive (WFD). Multiple elicitation methods (a discrete choice experiment and two forms of contingent valuation) are employed, with the order in which they are asked randomly varied across respondents, to obtain a robust model for valuing specified WFD implementation programs applied to all of the lakes, reservoirs, rivers, canals, transitional, and coastal waters of England and Wales. The potential for subsequent policy incorporation and value transfer was enhanced by generating area‐based values. These were found to vary from £2,263 to £39,168 per km 2 depending on the population density around the location of the improvement, the ecological scope of that improvement, and the value elicitation method employed. While the former factors are consistent with expectations, the latter suggests that decision makers need to be aware of such methodological effects when employing derived values.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here