z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Ecological controls on net ecosystem productivity of a mesic arctic tundra under current and future climates
Author(s) -
Grant R. F.,
Humphreys E. R.,
Lafleur P. M.,
Dimitrov D. D.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: biogeosciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2010jg001555
Subject(s) - tundra , primary production , environmental science , climate change , eddy covariance , ecosystem , arctic , growing season , atmospheric sciences , productivity , ecosystem respiration , global warming , ecology , climatology , biology , economics , macroeconomics , geology
Changes in arctic C stocks with climate are thought to be caused by rising net primary productivity (NPP) during longer and warmer growing seasons, offset by rising heterotrophic respiration ( R h ) in warmer and deeper soil active layers. In this study, we used the process model ecosys to test hypotheses for these changes with CO 2 and energy fluxes measured by eddy covariance over a mesic shrub tundra at Daring Lake, Canada, under varying growing seasons. These tests corroborated substantial rises in NPP, smaller rises in R h , and, hence, rises in net ecosystem productivity (NEP) from 17 to 45 g C m −2 yr −1 (net C sink), modeled with higher T a and longer growing seasons. However, NEP was found to decline briefly during midsummer warming events ( T a > 20°C). A model run under climate change predicted for Daring Lake indicated that rises in NPP would exceed those in R h during the first 100 years, causing NEP to rise. Rises in NPP were driven by more rapid net N mineralization from more rapid R h in warming soils. However, greater declines in NEP were modeled during more frequent and intense midsummer warming events as climate change progressed. Consequently, average annual NEP (± interannual variability) rose from 30 (±13) g C m −2 yr −1 under current climate to 57 (±40) g C m −2 yr −1 after 90 years but declined to 44 (±51) g C m −2 yr −1 after 150 years, indicating that gains in tundra NEP under climate change may not be indefinite.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here