z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Methane hydrate induced permeability modification for multiphase flow in unsaturated porous media
Author(s) -
Seol Yongkoo,
Kneafsey Timothy J.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2010jb008040
Subject(s) - hydrate , saturation (graph theory) , clathrate hydrate , porosity , methane , permeability (electromagnetism) , porous medium , multiphase flow , materials science , fluid dynamics , relative permeability , geology , pore water pressure , mineralogy , mechanics , geotechnical engineering , chemistry , physics , biochemistry , organic chemistry , membrane , mathematics , combinatorics
An experimental study was performed using X‐ray computed tomography (CT) scanning to capture three‐dimensional (3‐D) methane hydrate distributions and potential discrete flow pathways in a sand pack sample. A numerical study was also performed to develop and analyze empirical relations that describe the impacts of hydrate accumulation habits within pore space (e.g., pore filling or grain cementing) on multiphase fluid migration. In the experimental study, water was injected into a hydrate‐bearing sand sample that was monitored using an X‐ray CT scanner. The CT images were converted into numerical grid elements, providing intrinsic sample data including porosity and phase saturations. The impacts of hydrate accumulation were examined by adapting empirical relations into the flow simulations as additional relations governing the evolution of absolute permeability of hydrate bearing sediment with hydrate deposition. The impacts of pore space hydrate accumulation habits on fluid migration were examined by comparing numerical predictions with experimentally measured water saturation distributions and breakthrough curves. A model case with 3‐D heterogeneous initial conditions (hydrate saturation, porosity, and water saturation) and pore body–preferred hydrate accumulations best captured water migration behavior through the hydrate‐bearing sample observed in the experiment. In the best matching model, absolute permeability in the hydrate bearing sample does not decrease significantly with increasing hydrate saturation until hydrate saturation reaches about 40%, after which it drops rapidly, and complete blockage of flow through the sample can occur as hydrate accumulations approach 70%. The result highlights the importance of permeability modification due to hydrate accumulation habits when predicting multiphase flow through high‐saturation, reservoir quality hydrate‐bearing sediments.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here