z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reconstructions of the coastal impact of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in the Khao Lak area, Thailand
Author(s) -
Mård Karlsson Johanna,
Skelton Alasdair,
Sandén Michael,
Ioualalen Mansour,
Kaewbanjak Narongrit,
Pophet Nuttita,
Asavanant Jack,
von Matern Axel
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: oceans
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2009jc005516
Subject(s) - geology , submarine pipeline , satellite , oceanography , engineering , aerospace engineering
Khao Lak, SW Thailand was severely affected by the tsunami on 26 December 2004. Here we present reconstructions of its coastal impact in this area. These are based on (1) eyewitness reports alone and (2) eyewitness reports supported by videos and photos of the tsunami and the damage it caused, field measurements, and satellite imagery. On the basis of eyewitness reports, we estimated that the sea began retreating at 1000 local time (LT) and, based also on photos, that the tsunami arrived at 1026–1029 LT. On the basis of videos of the tsunami, we estimated an offshore wave direction of 083 ± 3° and on the basis of the paths by which eyewitnesses were carried, we estimated an onshore direction of 088 ± 6°. On the basis of videos, we calculated that the velocity of the wavefront on its final approach was 33 ± 4 km/h. We obtained tsunami heights of 7.3 ± 0.8 m (relative to ground level) on the basis of eyewitness reports and 8.0 ± 0.6 m (relative to mean sea level) on the basis of field and photographic data. On the basis of eyewitness reports and photos, we concluded that Khao Lak experienced at least two main waves with a period >40 min. From eyewitness reports and satellite imagery, we measured maximum inundation ≤0.5 km in the southern part of the area, which is confined by a steeply sloping hinterland, and ≤1.5 km in the more gently sloping northern part. Comparison between these reconstructions supports the reliability of eyewitness reports as a source of quantitative data, and comparison with the numerical simulation by Ioualalen et al. (2007) supports the validity of the simulation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom