z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effects of the crater on eruption column dynamics
Author(s) -
Koyaguchi Takehiro,
Suzuki Yujiro J.,
Kozono Tomofumi
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2009jb007146
Subject(s) - impact crater , geology , pyroclastic rock , magma , explosive eruption , volcano , radius , petrology , mechanics , seismology , physics , computer security , astronomy , computer science
During explosive eruptions, a mixture of pyroclasts and volcanic gas forms a buoyant eruption column or a pyroclastic flow. We systematically investigate how the condition that separates these two eruption styles (column collapse condition) depends on crater shape and magma chamber conditions by integrating the theoretical models for conduit flow, flow inside a crater, and eruption column dynamics. The results show that previous model predictions of column collapse condition based on the relationship between magma discharge rate () and water content ( n f ) strongly depend on crater shape (depth D and opening angle θ). When a crater is present, the decompression and/or compression of gas‐pyroclast mixture inside and just above the crater result in two distinct types of column collapse: collapse with increasing (HM‐side collapse) and that with decreasing (LM‐side collapse). HM‐side collapse is caused by an increase in conduit radius during the waxing stage of an eruption. LM‐side collapse is associated with a decrease in magma chamber pressure during the waning stage. The value of for HM‐side collapse varies by two orders of magnitude depending on crater shape for fixed n f . This estimate also depends on assumed models for decompression into the atmosphere. The value of for LM‐side collapse is <10 6 kg s −1 for a shallow crater with a small opening angle, whereas it can be >10 8 kg s −1 when D tan θ > 10 2 m. These results are consistent with the field observations from the St. Helens 1980 and Pinatubo 1991 eruptions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here