Premium
Closing the terrestrial water budget from satellite remote sensing
Author(s) -
Sheffield Justin,
Ferguson Craig R.,
Troy Tara J.,
Wood Eric F.,
McCabe Matthew F.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/2009gl037338
Subject(s) - streamflow , evapotranspiration , environmental science , water cycle , satellite , precipitation , water balance , closure (psychology) , remote sensing , water resources , drainage basin , meteorology , hydrology (agriculture) , geology , geography , aerospace engineering , engineering , ecology , cartography , geotechnical engineering , economics , market economy , biology
The increasing availability of remote sensing products for all components of the terrestrial water cycle makes it now possible to evaluate the potential of water balance closure purely from remote sensing sources. We take precipitation (P) from the TMPA and CMORPH products, a Penman‐Monteith based evapotranspiration (E) estimate derived from NASA Aqua satellite data and terrestrial water storage change (ΔS) from the GRACE satellite. Their combined ability to close the water budget is evaluated over the Mississippi River basin for 2003–5 by estimating streamflow (Q) as a residual of the water budget and comparing to streamflow measurements. We find that Q is greatly overestimated due mainly to the high bias in P, especially in the summer. Removal of systematic biases in P reduces the error significantly. However, uncertainties in the individual budget components due to simplifications in process algorithms and input data error are generally larger than the measured streamflow.