Premium
Tree ring evidence for limited direct CO 2 fertilization of forests over the 20th century
Author(s) -
Gedalof Ze'ev,
Berg Aaron A.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
global biogeochemical cycles
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.512
H-Index - 187
eISSN - 1944-9224
pISSN - 0886-6236
DOI - 10.1029/2009gb003699
Subject(s) - human fertilization , productivity , environmental science , dendrochronology , climate change , latitude , carbon sequestration , ecology , pinus <genus> , global warming , atmospheric sciences , agronomy , biology , geography , botany , carbon dioxide , geology , paleontology , geodesy , economics , macroeconomics
The effect that rising atmospheric CO 2 levels will have on forest productivity and water use efficiency remains uncertain, yet it has critical implications for future rates of carbon sequestration and forest distributions. Efforts to understand the effect that rising CO 2 will have on forests are largely based on growth chamber studies of seedlings, and the relatively small number of FACE sites. Inferences from these studies are limited by their generally short durations, artificial growing conditions, unnatural step‐increases in CO 2 concentrations, and poor replication. Here we analyze the global record of annual radial tree growth, derived from the International Tree ring Data Bank (ITRDB), for evidence of increasing growth rates that cannot be explained by climatic change alone, and for evidence of decreasing sensitivity to drought. We find that approximately 20 percent of sites globally exhibit increasing trends in growth that cannot be attributed to climatic causes, nitrogen deposition, elevation, or latitude, which we attribute to a direct CO 2 fertilization effect. No differences were found between species in their likelihood to exhibit growth increases attributable to CO 2 fertilization, although Douglas‐fir ( Pseudotsuga menziesii ) and ponderosa pine ( Pinus ponderosa ), the two most commonly sampled species in the ITRDB, exhibit a CO 2 fertilization signal at frequencies very near their upper and lower confidence limits respectively. Overall these results suggest that CO 2 fertilization of forests will not counteract emissions or slow warming in any substantial fashion, but do suggest that future forest dynamics may differ from those seen today depending on site conditions and individual species' responses to elevated CO 2 .