Premium
Regionalization of transit time estimates in montane catchments by integrating landscape controls
Author(s) -
Hrachowitz M.,
Soulsby C.,
Tetzlaff D.,
Dawson J. J. C.,
Malcolm I. A.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/2008wr007496
Subject(s) - environmental science , precipitation , hydrology (agriculture) , range (aeronautics) , transferability , streams , physical geography , geology , geography , statistics , meteorology , mathematics , computer network , materials science , geotechnical engineering , logit , computer science , composite material
Mean transit time (MTT) is being increasingly used as a metric of hydrological function in intercatchment comparisons. Estimating MTT usually involves relating the temporally varying input concentration of a conservative tracer to the signal in the stream using various transfer functions as transit time distributions (TTDs). Most studies have been confined to data collection periods of 1–2 years at single sites, often limiting the transferability of the findings as such short periods usually only capture a narrow range of climatic variability within a spatially restricted area. In this study, we use longer‐term (up to 17 years) weekly input‐output relationships of Cl − to estimate MTTs using a range of TTD models in 20 headwater catchments (ranging from <1 to 35 km 2 ) in seven geomorphologically and climatically distinct parts of the Scottish Highlands. The MTTs obtained from a Gamma distribution model were the best identified and ranged from about 50 to 1700 days for individual catchments. The MTTs, in conjunction with GIS analysis of landscape characteristics and climatic indices, allowed the development of a robust multiple‐regression model to establish the relative importance of different landscape and climate controls on MTTs. The best model combines the prediction variables percent responsive soil cover, drainage density, precipitation intensity, and topographic wetness index and yields R 2 adj = 0.88. Cross validation shows small absolute error, suggesting that the model can be used to estimate MTTs in ungauged headwater catchments throughout the Scottish Highlands and potentially in similar regions where comparable information is available.