Premium
Thermospheric density model blending techniques: Bridging the gap between satellites and sounding rockets
Author(s) -
Kim Jung Soo,
Spencer David B.,
Kane Timothy J.,
Urbina Julio
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
radio science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.371
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1944-799X
pISSN - 0048-6604
DOI - 10.1029/2008rs004069
Subject(s) - incoherent scatter , thermosphere , density of air , atmospheric sounding , satellite , computational physics , radar , atmospheric models , remote sensing , physics , bridging (networking) , drag , depth sounding , environmental science , meteorology , ionosphere , geology , geophysics , aerospace engineering , atmosphere (unit) , mechanics , computer science , astronomy , computer network , oceanography , engineering
Uncertainty in the atmospheric density is a crucial error source in calculating orbits of satellites in low Earth orbit. As a result, establishing accurate thermospheric neutral density models is important for predicting the motion of these satellites. Unfortunately, since density data in the altitude range between 140 and 200 km are sparse, predicting the neutral density to estimate atmospheric drag effects on the motion of satellites operating in this altitude region is subject to relatively large errors. A previous study found that the Jacchia‐Bowman model (JB2006) is the most reliable thermospheric empirical neutral density model above 200 km and the Naval Research Laboratory's Mass Spectrometer Incoherent Scatter (NRLMSISE‐00) model, whose core formulation is based on incoherent scatter radar data, can be considered a more reliable neutral density model below approximately 140 km. We have developed a simple bridging technique to blend the two models between these two regions. A two‐body model with atmospheric drag was used to compare effects of various atmospheric density models. These preliminary tests are conducted by propagating the positions of satellites orbiting between 140 and 200 km, with various ballistic coefficients, using the JB2006, the NRLMSISE‐00, and the bridging technique.