Premium
Three‐way validation of the Rankin Inlet PolarDARN radar velocity measurements
Author(s) -
Koustov A. V.,
St.Maurice J.P.,
Sofko G. J.,
Andre D.,
MacDougall J. W.,
Hairston M. R.,
Fiori R. A.,
Kadochnikov E. E.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
radio science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.371
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1944-799X
pISSN - 0048-6604
DOI - 10.1029/2008rs004045
Subject(s) - ionosonde , radar , inlet , geology , geodesy , ionosphere , bay , remote sensing , meteorology , physics , geophysics , telecommunications , geomorphology , oceanography , computer science , electron density , quantum mechanics , electron
The newly installed Rankin Inlet HF radar is very similar to other SuperDARN radars but uses a new type of antennae with its back lobe overlooking the auroral zone where ionospheric irregularities occur very frequently. Despite the fact that a special screen has been installed, there is a chance to receive echoes from the back/side lobe, which can affect the observed velocities. In this study, Rankin Inlet HF radar (RKN) velocities are compared with measurements from three independent instruments: the HF radar in Saskatoon, the CADI ionosonde at Resolute Bay, and drift meters on board DMSP satellites passing the RKN field of view. Although data spread and the degree of agreement vary from one comparison to another, the overall conclusion is that even if echoes are received from the back/side lobe, their effect is statistically insignificant. RKN velocities were found to be comparable to those inferred from other instrument outputs; the slope of the best fit line and the correlation coefficient can be as high as 0.7 and 0.8, respectively. The majority of inconsistencies are related to the difference in the spatial and temporal resolutions of the instruments involved in the comparison.