z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Identifying global dust source areas using high‐resolution land surface form
Author(s) -
Koven Charles D.,
Fung Inez
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2008jd010195
Subject(s) - environmental science , mineral dust , aeolian processes , aerosol , atmospheric sciences , digital elevation model , deposition (geology) , scale (ratio) , meteorology , remote sensing , geology , geography , geomorphology , sediment , cartography
Dust originates from specific, landscape‐scale (≈1–10 km) features; however, dust erodibility is commonly parameterized in global climate models using grid‐cell‐scale (≈1–5°) relationships. We examine surface characteristics from the high‐ resolution (90 m at equator) global Shuttle Radar Topography Mission digital elevation model and aerosol optical thickness (AOT) measurements from the Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) instrument to find landscape‐scale characteristics common to dust producing regions. Regions with climatologically high aerosol optical thickness are associated with extremely low‐slope landscapes at ≈5 km scale that also have high‐elevation variance, likely due to aeolian features. We refer to these landscape characteristics as “levelness” and “residual landscape roughness,” and we extrapolate these relationships globally to identify geomorphologically based dust erodibility functions on the basis of levelness and residual landscape roughness criteria. We test these with the Dust Entrainment and Deposition model embedded in the Model for Atmospheric Transport and Chemistry global atmospheric tracer transport model, driven by reanalysis meteorology. The modeled global dust spatial distributions calculated with these erodibility parameters agree well with observations of MISR AOT and deposition and in the modeling framework used here represent an improvement over existing parameterizations in predicting the spatial patterns of dust sources in the Sahara and the relative amount of emission of sources in the Dust Belt to those in the Southern Hemisphere; however, agreement with observations is less good in high‐relief areas such as the Asian dust source regions, possibly because of the coarse resolution of the meteorological fields used to drive the model.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here