
Unified analyses for P ‐ V ‐ T equation of state of MgO: A solution for pressure‐scale problems in high P ‐ T experiments
Author(s) -
Tange Yoshinori,
Nishihara Yu,
Tsuchiya Taku
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2008jb005813
Subject(s) - thermodynamics , equation of state , isothermal process , bulk modulus , thermal expansion , debye model , volume (thermodynamics) , adiabatic process , compression (physics) , grüneisen parameter , materials science , physics , high pressure , atmospheric temperature range
In order to determine an accurate and reliable high‐pressure and high‐temperature equation of state (EOS) of MgO, unified analyses were carried out for various pressure‐scale‐free experimental data sets measured at 1 atm to 196 GPa and 300–3700 K, which are zero‐pressure thermal expansion data, zero‐pressure and high‐temperature adiabatic bulk modulus ( K S ) data, room temperature and high‐pressure K S data, and shock compression data. After testing several EOS models based on the Mie‐Grüneisen‐Debye description for the thermal pressures with the Vinet and the third‐order Birch‐Murnaghan equations for the 300‐K isothermal compression, we determined the K ′ T 0 and γ ( V ) using a new functional form γ = γ 0 {1 + a [( V / V 0 ) b − 1]} to express the volume dependence of the Grüneisen parameter. Through least squares analyses with prerequisite zero‐pressure and room temperature properties of V 0 , K S 0 , α 0 , and C P 0 , we simultaneously optimized a set of parameters of K ′ T 0 , γ 0 , a , and b required to represent the P ‐ V ‐ T EOS. Determined new EOS models of MgO successfully reproduced all the analyzed P ‐ V ‐ T ‐ K S data up to 196 GPa and 3700 K within the uncertainties, and the total residuals between calculated and observed pressures were found to be 0.8 GPa in root mean squares. These EOS models, even though very simple, are able to reproduce available data quite accurately in the wide pressure‐temperature range and completely independent from other pressure scales. We propose these models for primary pressure calibration standards applicable to quantitative high‐pressure and high‐temperature experiments.