Premium
Emissions of CH 4 and N 2 O over the United States and Canada based on a receptor‐oriented modeling framework and COBRA‐NA atmospheric observations
Author(s) -
Kort Eric A.,
Eluszkiewicz Janusz,
Stephens Britton B.,
Miller John B.,
Gerbig Christoph,
Nehrkorn Thomas,
Daube Bruce C.,
Kaplan Jed O.,
Houweling Sander,
Wofsy Steven C.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/2008gl034031
Subject(s) - greenhouse gas , nitrous oxide , environmental science , methane , atmospheric sciences , lagrangian , atmospheric dispersion modeling , dispersion (optics) , scaling , meteorology , air pollution , physics , chemistry , geology , mathematics , oceanography , geometry , organic chemistry , optics , mathematical physics
We present top‐down emission constraints for two non‐CO 2 greenhouse gases in large areas of the U.S. and southern Canada during early summer. Collocated airborne measurements of methane and nitrous oxide acquired during the COBRA‐NA campaign in May–June 2003, analyzed using a receptor‐oriented Lagrangian particle dispersion model, provide robust validation of independent bottom‐up emission estimates from the EDGAR and GEIA inventories. We find that the EDGAR CH 4 emission rates are slightly low by a factor of 1.08 ± 0.15 (2 σ ), while both EDGAR and GEIA N 2 O emissions are significantly too low, by factors of 2.62 ± 0.50 and 3.05 ± 0.61, respectively, for this region. Potential footprint bias may expand the statistically retrieved uncertainties. Seasonality of agricultural N 2 O emissions may help explain the discrepancy. Total anthropogenic U.S. and Canadian emissions would be 49 Tg CH 4 and 4.3 Tg N 2 O annually, if these inventory scaling factors applied to all of North America.