z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Motion on upper‐plate faults during subduction zone earthquakes: Case of the Atacama Fault System, northern Chile
Author(s) -
Loveless J. P.,
Pritchard M. E.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.928
H-Index - 136
ISSN - 1525-2027
DOI - 10.1029/2008gc002155
Subject(s) - geology , seismology , interferometric synthetic aperture radar , subduction , geodesy , slip (aerodynamics) , forearc , geodetic datum , fault (geology) , episodic tremor and slip , tectonics , synthetic aperture radar , remote sensing , physics , thermodynamics
Motion on the Atacama Fault System (AFS) in northern Chile is driven by Andean subduction zone processes. We use two approaches, observational and theoretical, to evaluate how the AFS and other forearc faults responded to coseismic stress induced by one well‐studied megathrust earthquake, the 1995 M w = 8.1 Antofagasta event. We use synthetic aperture radar interferometry (InSAR) to search for small‐scale coseismic and postseismic deformation on individual faults. The InSAR data are ambiguous: some images show offset consistent with coseismic faulting on the Paposo segment of the AFS and others lack such signal. The fact that we do not observe the fault‐like displacement in all coseismic interferograms suggests that atmospheric contamination, not tectonic deformation, is responsible for the signal. To explore the capacity of the earthquake to trigger motion on upper plate faults, we use seven published slip maps constrained by geodetic and/or seismic data to calculate static and dynamic Coulomb stress change (CSC) on faults in the Antofagasta region. The static CSC field varies between models and depends on the distribution of coseismic interplate slip. On the basis of the CSC distribution predicted by our preferred model constrained by all available data, we suggest it was unlikely that the Antofagasta earthquake directly triggered normal motion on the AFS, and the InSAR data are consistent with this null result. Field reports of normal faulting related to the earthquake may reflect recent (but not coseismic) motion or highly localized behavior not representative of the regional coseismic stress field.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here