Open AccessCrustal thickness variations along the Southeast Indian Ridge (100°–116°E) from 2‐D body wave tomography
Author(s) -
Holmes R. Chadwick,
Tolstoy Maya,
Cochran James R.,
Floyd Jacqueline S.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.928
H-Index - 136
ISSN - 1525-2027
DOI - 10.1029/2008gc002152
Subject(s) - geology , mantle (geology) , mid ocean ridge , ridge , magma chamber , mid atlantic ridge , basalt , rift , seismic tomography , seismology , seismic refraction , rift valley , hydrothermal circulation , petrology , volcano , geophysics , tectonics , magma , paleontology
Axial morphology along the Southeast Indian Ridge (SEIR) systematically changes from an axial high to a deep rift valley at a nearly uniform intermediate spreading rate between 100°–116°E, west of the Australian‐Antarctic Discordance (AAD). Basalt geochemistry has a consistent Indian–mid‐ocean ridge basalt (MORB) type isotopic signature, so changes in axial topography are attributed to variations in both mantle temperature and melt supply. Wide‐angle seismic refraction lines were shot to four ocean bottom hydrophones within SEIR segments P1, P2, S1, and T, where each segment is characterized by a different morphology. We constructed 2‐D crustal velocity models by jointly inverting hand‐picked P wave refraction (Pg) and Moho reflection (PmP) traveltime data using a top‐down, minimum‐structure methodology. The results show a 1.5 km eastward decrease in crustal thickness across the study area, with segment averages ranging from 6.1 km at P1 to 4.6 km at T. Melt generation models require a ∼30°C decrease in mantle temperature toward the AAD to account for the crustal thickness trend. Significant changes in axial morphology accompany small‐scale variations in crustal thickness, consistent with models of crustal accretion where ridge topography is determined by a balance between mantle temperature, melt supply, and cooling from hydrothermal circulation. Layer 3 thins by 3.0 km as layer 2 thickens by 1.4 km between segments P1 and T, reflecting the eastward decrease in melt supply and increase in melt lens depth. The trade‐off in seismic layers may be explained by models relating the increase in overburden pressure on a deepening melt lens to the volume of magma erupted into the upper crust rather than cooling at depth to form new lower crustal material.