z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Model evaluation of CO 2 and SF 6 in the extratropical UT/LS region
Author(s) -
Bönisch H.,
Hoor P.,
Gurk Ch.,
Feng W.,
Chipperfield M.,
Engel A.,
Bregman B.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2007jd008829
Subject(s) - stratosphere , troposphere , extratropical cyclone , atmospheric sciences , tropopause , climatology , environmental science , polar vortex , radiosonde , geology
We evaluate the transport of three‐dimensional chemical transport models in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere applying observed distributions of CO 2 and SF 6 . The data consist of high‐resolution in situ observations, obtained during all seasons at subtropical, middle and high latitudes over Western Europe within the SPURT (Spurenstofftransport in der Tropopausenregion) project (2001–2003). We show that the combination of the two passive tracers SF 6 and CO 2 with their different tropospheric characteristics and the propagation of the temporal trends of these two gases into the lower stratosphere is a powerful diagnostic for evaluation of model transport. The model evaluation shows that all models are able to capture the general features in the tracer distributions including the vertical and horizontal propagation of the CO 2 seasonal cycle. However, the modeled CO 2 cycles are a few months out of phase in the lowermost stratosphere due to tropospheric mixing. Two models show a too strong Brewer‐Dobson circulation causing an overestimation of the tracers in the lowermost stratosphere during winter and spring. One model displays a too strong tropical isolation leading to an underestimation of the tracers in the lowermost stratosphere during winter. All models suffer to some extend from diffusion and/or too strong mixing across the tropopause. In addition, the models show too weak vertical upward transport into the upper troposphere during the boreal summer. Sensitivity studies show that our initial conditions and boundary constraints are realistic and that a horizontal resolution higher than 2 degrees and an increase of the meteorology update frequency (from 6 to 3‐hourly) have negligible impact on the modeled CO 2 and SF 6 distributions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here