z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) retrievals during dust outbreaks over the Mediterranean
Author(s) -
Santese M.,
De Tomasi F.,
Perrone M. R.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2007jd008482
Subject(s) - aeronet , moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer , environmental science , aerosol , angstrom exponent , spectroradiometer , mediterranean climate , remote sensing , mediterranean sea , atmospheric sciences , climatology , satellite , meteorology , geology , geography , physics , reflectivity , archaeology , astronomy , optics
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)–ocean aerosol products and corresponding Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) data retrieved during Sahara dust outbreaks that occurred over the central Mediterranean basin have been analyzed, to contribute to the validation of MODIS retrievals during dust‐loading conditions. It is shown that MODIS aerosol optical depths (AOD M ) retrieved at 550 nm for window sizes of 50 × 50 km 2 centered at different Mediterranean AERONET sites are in satisfactory accordance to corresponding AERONET optical depths (AOD A ) colocated in space and time: Correlation factor and slope of the linear regression are 0.86 and 1.04, respectively, and 42% of data points are within the prespecified accuracy range. However, the plot of the differences (AOD M – AOD A ) versus AOD A has revealed that the differences (AOD M – AOD A ) are almost positive and increase with AOD A , and has led assuming that MODIS overestimates AODs mainly during high dust load conditions. The comparison of MODIS‐ocean and corresponding AERONET fine‐mode fractions ( η M and η A , respectively) colocated in space has revealed that the MODIS‐ocean inversion algorithm overestimates the contribution of fine‐mode particles for dust‐dominated aerosols: ( η M − η A ) difference values vary within the 0.11–0.24 range. In addition, the comparison of MODIS‐ocean and corresponding AERONET volume size distributions has revealed that the latter results are mainly due to the poor sensitivity of the MODIS‐ocean inversion algorithm to the concentration of coarse‐mode particles during dust outbreaks. The frequency distributions of MODIS fine and coarse volume modal radii are found to be rather close to corresponding AERONET frequency distributions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here