z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Saturation of the polar cap potential: Inference from Alfvén wing arguments
Author(s) -
Kivelson Margaret G.,
Ridley Aaron J.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2007ja012302
Subject(s) - physics , solar wind , ionosphere , computational physics , electric field , geophysics , polar , saturation (graph theory) , interplanetary magnetic field , atmospheric sciences , magnetic field , mathematics , astronomy , combinatorics , quantum mechanics
The cross polar cap potential varies roughly linearly with the solar wind electric field for nominal conditions but asymptotes to a constant value of order 200 kV for large electric field. When the impedance of the solar wind across open polar cap field lines dominates the impedance of the ionosphere, Alfvén waves incident from the solar wind are partially reflected, reducing the signal in the polar cap. Thus, the ratio of the cross polar cap potential to the potential imposed by the solar wind is 2Σ A /(Σ P + Σ A ), where Σ A is the Alfvén conductance of the solar wind (= ( ρ sw / μ o ) 1/2 / B sw ) to within a density‐dependent factor on average of order 1, Σ P is the Pedersen conductance of the ionosphere, and ρ sw ( B sw ) is the density (magnetic field magnitude) of the solar wind. For small B sw , the response is proportional to B sw . For large B sw , the cross polar cap potential depends only on the solar wind dynamic pressure (with small viscous and density‐dependent corrections). Quantitative estimates require knowledge of Σ P and the dependence of the potential imposed by the solar wind on its measured properties; standard assumptions yield saturation levels consistent with observations made during 13 storm intervals. Previous explanations of saturation have invoked changing reconnection efficiency, specific characteristics of the Region 1 current system, or the effect of the bow shock on the reconnecting plasma. Although our relation is mathematically similar to some previously proposed, our arguments place no constraints on reconnection efficiency or on magnetospheric geometry.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom