Premium
Scenario workshops: A useful method for participatory water resources planning?
Author(s) -
Hatzilacou Dionyssia,
Kallis Giorgos,
Mexa Alexandra,
Coccosis Harris,
Svoronou Eleni
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/2006wr004878
Subject(s) - water framework directive , framing (construction) , citizen journalism , participatory planning , process management , water resources , sustainable development , management science , context (archaeology) , action plan , computer science , environmental planning , business , environmental resource management , political science , engineering , management , economics , civil engineering , ecology , paleontology , environmental science , world wide web , law , water quality , biology
This article reports on a scenario workshop (SW) for water resources management at the island of Naxos, Greece. The workshop was part of a European research project studying the advantages and limitations of different participatory methods in the context of the Water Framework Directive. It involved policy makers, scientists, business representatives, and citizens from different parts of the island. On the first day, participants worked to envision a sustainable development future for the island and its water resources. Discussion was inspired by four alternative water development scenarios prepared by the organizers. Participants' vision statements emphasized a diversified development path and balanced water solutions. On the second day, participants worked to plan the actions needed to realize their common vision. The SW turned out to be a good method to initiate a multipartner dialogue, to include new stakeholders in the water policy debate, and to a certain extent, to promote learning between participants. On the other hand, it did not appear well suited to resolve conflicts and aid decisions in the face of scientific complexity and uncertainty. SW seems to be a good method for the “upstream,” preparatory, capacity‐building tasks of a planning process but not for the production of substantive decision outputs such as consensual agreements or action plans. The Naxos experiment also raised the centrality of framing, participant selection, and facilitation in participatory processes.