z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A comparison of satellite tropospheric carbon monoxide measurements from AIRS and MOPITT during INTEX‐A
Author(s) -
Warner Juying,
Comer M. McCourt,
Barnet C. D.,
McMillan W. W.,
Wolf W.,
Maddy E.,
Sachse G.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2006jd007925
Subject(s) - troposphere , atmospheric infrared sounder , environmental science , satellite , atmospheric sciences , atmosphere (unit) , meteorology , climatology , remote sensing , geology , geography , engineering , aerospace engineering
Satellite CO measurements from Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) and Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) were used in the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment–North America (INTEX‐A) by the flight planning team to monitor local emissions and the transport of polluted air masses. Because simultaneous measurements of tropospheric CO from both AIRS and MOPITT were used by different investigators during this experiment, a cross reference and comparison are necessary to understand these two data sets and their impacts to the scientific conclusions developed from them. The global CO mixing ratios at 500 mbar, as well as the CO total column amount, are compared between the two instruments for both direct comparison and the comparison using the same a priori profile for the period from 15 June to 14 August 2004. Also presented are the comparisons of the remotely sensed profiles by AIRS, MOPITT, and the in situ profiles collected by the DACOM. In summary, both sensors agree very well on the horizontal distributions of CO represented by the high correlation coefficients (0.7–0.98), and they agree on the CO concentrations to within an average of 10–15 ppbv. Over land, the CO variability is higher, and the correlations between the two data sets are relatively lower than over ocean; however, there is no evidence of a systematic bias. Over the oceans where the CO concentration is smaller in the lower atmosphere, AIRS‐MOPITT show a positive bias of 15–20 ppbv and the details are presented.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here