Open AccessEstimation of aerosol single scattering albedo from solar direct spectral radiance and total broadband irradiances measured in China
Author(s) -
Zhao Fengsheng,
Li Zhanqing
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2006jd007384
Subject(s) - radiance , sun photometer , aerosol , aeronet , angstrom exponent , environmental science , remote sensing , sky , irradiance , photometer , spectroradiometer , albedo (alchemy) , atmospheric radiative transfer codes , radiative transfer , meteorology , physics , optics , geology , reflectivity , art , performance art , art history
Aerosol single scattering albedo ( ω o ) is a primary factor dictating aerosol radiative effect. Ground‐based remote sensing of ω o has been employed most widely using spectral sky radiance measurements made from a scanning Sun photometer. Reliable results can be achieved for high aerosol loadings and for solar zenith angle >50°. This study presents an alternative method using spectral direct radiance measurements or aerosol optical depths together with total sky irradiance to retrieve ω o . The method does not require sky radiance data that can only be acquired by the expensive scanning Sun photometer. The method is evaluated using extensive measurements by a suite of instruments deployed in northern China under the East Asian Study of Tropospheric Aerosols: An International Regional Experiment (EAST‐AIRE) project. The sensitivities of the retrieval to various uncertain factors were first examined by means of radiative transfer simulations. It was found the retrieval is most sensitive to cloud screening, total irradiance and the Angstrom Exponent (AE), but only weakly depends on surface albedo and the fine structure of aerosol size distribution. Using 1 year of rigorously screened clear‐sky measurements made at the Xianghe site, the retrieved ω o values were found to agree with those retrieved from the Cimel Sun photometer by the AERONET method to within ∼0.03 (RMS), and ∼0.003 (mean bias). As part of the differences originate from different sky views seen by the Sun photometers and pyranometer under comparison, a further test was conducted by using total sky irradiances simulated with the retrieved aerosol properties from the AERONET. The resulting estimates of ω o agree to within 0.01–0.02 (RMS differences) and 0.002–0.003 (mean bias). These values are better measure of the true retrieval uncertainties, as they are free from any data mismatch. The characteristics of ω o retrievals were discussed.