z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Ion thermalization and wave excitation downstream of Earth's bow shock: A theory for Cluster observations of He 2+ acceleration
Author(s) -
Liu Yong C.M.,
Lee Martin A.,
Kucharek Harald,
Miao Bin
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2006ja012239
Subject(s) - physics , atomic physics , shock wave , bow shock (aerodynamics) , excited state , amplitude , shock (circulatory) , ion , anisotropy , helium , excitation , computational physics , optics , mechanics , medicine , quantum mechanics
It has been well documented that the plasma immediately downstream of Earth's quasi‐perpendicular bow shock, which consists of reflected protons and directly transmitted ions with large temperature anisotropies ( T ⊥ / T z ), is unstable to the excitation of ion cyclotron waves. These waves in turn scatter the protons and ions to marginal stability. Using Cluster data following the inbound shock crossing at 1717:48 UT on 31 March 2001, we investigate the joint evolution of the proton and helium distribution functions. Within a short distance downstream of the shock the perpendicular heating of helium is faster than the parallel heating, so that the temperature anisotropy of helium first increases near the shock before decreasing farther downstream. The observed spectra of magnetic fluctuations, which are dominated by left‐hand circularly polarized waves, display one peak at < gα (He 2+ gyrofrequency), just downstream of the shock, and two peaks with a slot near ≈ gα , farther downstream, where is wave frequency in hertz. We present a quasi‐linear theory that accounts for the observed long‐time decrease of the He 2+ temperature anisotropy and the excited wave spectrum. The predicted temperature anisotropy and the general shape of the excited wave spectrum match the observations remarkably well. Nevertheless, certain features of the observations, such as the large amplitude of the lower‐frequency peak and very low amplitude of the higher‐frequency peak just downstream of the shock, require further work.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here