Premium
Potential bias of model projected greenhouse warming in irrigated regions
Author(s) -
Lobell D. B.,
Bala G.,
Bonfils C.,
Duffy P. B.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/2006gl026770
Subject(s) - environmental science , greenhouse gas , irrigation , precipitation , global warming , climate change , climate model , climatology , agriculture , atmospheric sciences , agronomy , meteorology , geography , ecology , geology , biology , archaeology
Atmospheric general circulation models (GCMs) used to project climate responses to increased CO 2 generally omit irrigation of agricultural land. Using the NCAR CAM3 GCM coupled to a slab‐ocean model, we find that inclusion of an extreme irrigation scenario has a small effect on the simulated temperature and precipitation response to doubled CO 2 in most regions, but reduced warming by as much as 1°C in some agricultural regions, such as Europe and India. This interaction between CO 2 and irrigation occurs in cases where agriculture is a major fraction of the land surface and where, in the absence of irrigation, soil moisture declines are projected to provide a positive feedback to temperature change. The reduction of warming is less than 25% of the temperature increase modeled for doubled CO 2 in most regions; thus greenhouse warming will still be dominant. However, the results indicate that land use interactions may be an important component of climate change uncertainty in some agricultural regions. While irrigated lands comprise only ∼2% of the land surface, they contribute over 40% of global food production. Climate changes in these regions are therefore particularly important to society despite their relatively small contribution to average global climate.