Open AccessCreating effective flood mitigation policies
Author(s) -
Fraser James C.,
Doyle Matrin W.,
Young Hannah
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
eos, transactions american geophysical union
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.316
H-Index - 86
eISSN - 2324-9250
pISSN - 0096-3941
DOI - 10.1029/2006eo270002
Subject(s) - flood insurance , liberian dollar , flood myth , reform act , emergency management , floodplain , business , agency (philosophy) , environmental planning , finance , environmental science , geography , economics , economic growth , public administration , political science , philosophy , cartography , archaeology , epistemology
Hurricane Katrina in 2005 increased awareness of the vulnerability of people and property in flood‐prone areas of the United States, particularly repetitively flooded properties. Prior to Katrina, repetitive loss properties cost the United States over $200 million annually [ General Accounting Office (GAO) , 2004]. The U.S. Congress passed the Bunning‐Bereuter‐Blumenauer Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2004 (FIRA) to maintain the fiscal soundness of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and ease the burden of repetitive loss properties on NFIP Federal calculations indicate that every dollar spent on mitigation activities creates a $3.65 savings in future disaster recovery costs, and the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) estimates that over $1 billion are spared annually through flood mitigation and floodplain management programs [ GAO , 2005a].