z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluation of Television Infrared Observation Satellite (TIROS‐N) Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) spaceborne CO 2 estimates using model simulations and aircraft data
Author(s) -
Peylin Philippe,
Bréon Francois Marie,
Serrar Soumia,
Tiwari Yogesh,
Chédin Alain,
Gloor Manuel,
Machida T.,
Brenninkmeijer C.,
Zahn Andreas,
Ciais Philippe
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2005jd007018
Subject(s) - satellite , environmental science , remote sensing , meteorology , geostationary operational environmental satellite , annual cycle , atmospheric sciences , climatology , geology , geography , aerospace engineering , engineering
CO 2 mixing ratio derived from spaceborne measurements of the Television Infrared Observation Satellite (TIROS‐N) Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) instrument onboard NOAA‐10 available for the time period 1987–1991 are evaluated against modeling results and aircraft measurements. The model simulations are based on two transport models and two sets of surface fluxes which have been optimized in order to fit near‐surface atmospheric CO 2 measurements through a transport model (using an inverse procedure). In the tropics the zonal mean annual cycle and growth rate of the satellite product are consistent with those of the models. However, north‐to‐south gradients and spatial distributions for a given month show large differences. There are large regional patterns that can reach 7 ppm in the satellite retrievals (over regions of a few thousand kilometers wide) but are absent in the model predictions. The root‐mean‐square (RMS) differences between the models and the satellite product are around 1.7 ppm. One time series of the model CO 2 trend is used to extrapolate to the airborne measurement periods (1991–2003) both the satellite and the model monthly products to the airborne measurement period. The RMS difference between the airborne measurements and the extrapolated model predictions is around 1 ppm, while it is 2 ppm for the satellite estimate. These comparisons suggest that the large spatial variability of TOVS retrievals reflects substantial regional biases and noise which need to be reduced before remotely sensed CO 2 from TOVS will help constrain our knowledge of the carbon cycle.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom