z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Modeling nighttime ecosystem respiration from measured CO 2 concentration and air temperature profiles using inverse methods
Author(s) -
Juang JehnYih,
Katul Gabriel G.,
Siqueira Mario B. S.,
Stoy Paul C.,
Palmroth Sari,
McCarthy Heather R.,
Kim HyunSeok,
Oren Ram
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2005jd005976
Subject(s) - eddy covariance , ecosystem respiration , environmental science , atmospheric sciences , canopy , ecosystem , stratification (seeds) , hydrology (agriculture) , soil science , ecology , physics , geology , botany , biology , seed dormancy , germination , geotechnical engineering , dormancy
A major challenge for quantifying ecosystem carbon budgets from micrometeorological methods remains nighttime ecosystem respiration. An earlier study utilized a constrained source optimization (CSO) method using inverse Lagrangian dispersion theory to infer the two components of ecosystem respiration (aboveground and forest floor) from measured mean CO 2 concentration profiles within the canopy. This method required measurements of within‐canopy mean velocity statistics and did not consider local thermal stratification. We propose a Eulerian version of the CSO method (CSO E ) to account for local thermal stratification within the canopy for momentum and scalars using higher‐order closure principles. This method uses simultaneous mean CO 2 concentration and air temperature profiles within the canopy and velocity statistics above the canopy as inputs. The CSO E was tested at a maturing loblolly pine plantation over a 3‐year period with a mild drought (2001), a severe drought (2002), and a wet year (2003). Annual forest floor efflux modeled with CSO E averaged 111 g C m −2 less than that estimated using chambers during these years (2001: 1224 versus 1328 gCm −2 ; 2002: 1127 versus 1230 gCm −2 ; 2003: 1473 versus 1599 gCm −2 ). The modeled ecosystem respiration exceeded estimates from eddy covariance measurements (uncorrected for storage fluxes) by at least 25%, even at high friction velocities. Finally, we showed that the CSO E annual nighttime respiration values agree well with independent estimates derived from the intercept of the ecosystem light‐response curve from daytime eddy covariance CO 2 flux measurements.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom