z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Radial anisotropy in seismic reference models of the mantle
Author(s) -
Beghein C.,
Trampert J.,
van Heijst H. J.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2005jb003728
Subject(s) - anisotropy , seismic anisotropy , geology , mantle (geology) , geophysics , shear wave splitting , seismic wave , discontinuity (linguistics) , core–mantle boundary , computational physics , physics , mathematics , optics , mathematical analysis
Sambridge's Neighborhood Algorithm was applied to normal mode and surface wave phase velocity data to determine the likelihood of radial anisotropy in mantle reference models. This full model space search technique provides probability density functions for each model parameter and therefore reliable estimates of resolution and uncertainty, without having to introduce unnecessary regularization on the model space. Our results for shear wave anisotropy (described by parameter ξ) show a fast decrease with depth with no significant deviation from Preliminary Reference Earth Model (PREM) at any depth. The data do not require strong deviations from PREM for P wave anisotropy either, except between 220 and 400 km depth and in the D″ layer. The intermediate parameter η might depart from PREM between 220 and 670 km depth. This implies a likely deeper P wave anisotropy and η anisotropy than S wave anisotropy. The sign change in the anisotropic parameters across the 670‐km discontinuity found by other authors is not warranted by our data set, which is far more extensive than in previous studies. We found that density needs to be well resolved because we observe a high dependence of the results for P wave‐related parameters on the presence or absence of density in the parameterization. S wave anisotropy and η are less affected by density. A well‐resolved negative density anomaly was found in the uppermost mantle, and a density excess was observed in the transition zone and the lowermost mantle which might be a seismic signature of the recently identified postperovskite phase.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here