z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
An orthogonal projection and regularization technique for magnetospheric radio tomography
Author(s) -
Zhai Yuhu,
Cummer Steven A.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2005ja011039
Subject(s) - orthonormal basis , singular value decomposition , orthogonal basis , inverse problem , algorithm , regularization (linguistics) , orthogonality , mathematics , tikhonov regularization , tomography , physics , computer science , mathematical analysis , geometry , artificial intelligence , optics , quantum mechanics
A challenging problem in ill‐posed inverse problems is incorporating prior knowledge of the solution into reconstruction techniques. This problem is particularly important in magnetospheric radio tomography where the path integrated measurements of the target region may be sparse. We present in this paper an orthogonal projection and regularization (OPR) technique that incorporates prior knowledge of magnetospheric parameters from existing models or past measurements into a direct reconstruction algorithm. The OPR scheme extracts first an optimal orthonormal basis containing the main features of the unknowns from an ensemble of modeled or measured snapshots through the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and then projects the line‐of‐sight equations onto the subspace spanned by the empirical orthonormal basis. The resulting low‐dimensional model is well‐conditioned, its coordinates are uncorrelated, and it contains prior knowledge of the solution. The magnetospheric parameters in the transformed coordinate are reconstructed from the low‐dimensional model and quantities in the physical coordinate are easily recovered from the POD transformation. On the basis of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations and hypothetical satellite constellations, we demonstrate that the POD‐based method may perform significantly better than the regularized direct method with sparse path‐integrated measurements, combined with a few (5–10) model snapshots.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here