z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effects of large deep‐seated landslides on hillslope morphology, western Southern Alps, New Zealand
Author(s) -
Korup Oliver
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: earth surface
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2004jf000242
Subject(s) - landslide , geology , denudation , bedrock , landslide classification , geomorphology , debris , structural basin , fluvial , digital elevation model , terrain , colluvium , drainage basin , magnitude (astronomy) , debris flow , hydrology (agriculture) , tectonics , seismology , remote sensing , geotechnical engineering , geography , cartography , oceanography , alluvium , physics , astronomy
Morphometric analysis and air photo interpretation highlight geomorphic imprints of large landslides (i.e., affecting ≥1 km 2 ) on hillslopes in the western Southern Alps (WSA), New Zealand. Large landslides attain kilometer‐scale runout, affect >50% of total basin relief, and in 70% are slope clearing, and thus relief limiting. Landslide terrain shows lower mean local relief, relief variability, slope angles, steepness, and concavity than surrounding terrain. Measuring mean slope angle smoothes out local landslide morphology, masking any relationship between large landslides and possible threshold hillslopes. Large failures also occurred on low‐gradient slopes, indicating persistent low‐frequency/high‐magnitude hillslope adjustment independent of fluvial bedrock incision. At the basin and hillslope scale, slope‐area plots partly constrain the effects of landslides on geomorphic process regimes. Landslide imprints gradually blend with relief characteristics at orogen scale (10 2 km), while being sensitive to length scales of slope failure, topography, sampling, and digital elevation model resolution. This limits means of automated detection, and underlines the importance of local morphologic contrasts for detecting large landslides in the WSA. Landslide controls on low‐order drainage include divide lowering and shifting, formation of headwater basins and hanging valleys, and stream piracy. Volumes typically mobilized, yet still stored in numerous deposits despite high denudation rates, are >10 7 m 3 , and theoretically equal to 10 2 years of basin‐wide debris production from historic shallow landslides; lack of absolute ages precludes further estimates. Deposit size and mature forest cover indicate residence times of 10 1 –10 4 years. On these timescales, large landslides require further attention in landscape evolution models of tectonically active orogens.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here