z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Abrupt transitions in gravity currents
Author(s) -
Amy L. A.,
Hogg A. J.,
Peakall J.,
Talling P. J.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: earth surface
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2004jf000197
Subject(s) - gravity current , slumping , mechanics , buoyancy , neutral buoyancy , scaling , physics , reynolds number , geology , turbulence , geometry , internal wave , mathematics , geomorphology
Pyroclastic flows and snow avalanches sometimes exhibit a rapid deceleration of their dense flow fronts and detachment of their dilute clouds. This behavior is also inferred for submarine flows and could explain stepped thickness patterns in their deposits. A similar “abrupt transition” process occurs in particle‐laden, lock release laboratory currents with relatively high concentrations. New experiments on nonparticulate, solute‐driven density currents were run to investigate the cause of abrupt transitions. Abrupt transitions occur in laboratory currents with Reynolds numbers ( Re ) less than 1000 and are interpreted, supported by theoretical scaling analysis, to signify a change in dynamic regime. Currents with high Re , which do not show abrupt transitions, undergo a downstream change in dynamic regime from (1) inertial slumping to (2) inertial‐buoyancy spreading to (3) viscous‐buoyancy spreading. In low Re currents that undergo abrupt transitions, however, the duration of the second regime is very short, and hence they appear to pass directly from the quickly moving slumping phase into the slowly moving viscous phase. Scaling analysis indicates that an abrupt transition should occur in currents below a critical value of Re of ∼10–5000 for currents with different initial aspect ratios. Given that natural flows typically have greater Reynolds numbers, we suggest that abrupt transitions in laboratory and natural currents are likely to be dynamically different. This work has important implications for the physical modeling of gravity flows.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here