Open Access
Geologic evolution of the Martian dichotomy in the Ismenius area of Mars and implications for plains magnetization
Author(s) -
Smrekar S. E.,
McGill G. E.,
Raymond C. A.,
Dimitriou A. M.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: planets
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2004je002260
Subject(s) - geology , crust , fault scarp , martian , graben , magnetic anomaly , gravity anomaly , geophysics , fault (geology) , mars exploration program , bouguer anomaly , impact crater , stratigraphy , seismology , tectonics , paleontology , physics , astronomy , oil field
The origin of the Martian dichotomy, which divides highlands from lowlands, is unknown. We examine a section of the dichotomy (50–90E) defined by steep scarps and normal faults. Stratigraphy and age relationships preclude the formation of the 2.5 km high boundary via erosion. The abrupt disappearance of topographic knobs ∼300–500 km to the northeast is interpreted as a buried fault. Alignment of the buried fault with grabens, stratigraphy, and age determinations using crater counts indicate that the lowland bench is down faulted highlands crust. The estimated local strain (3.5%) and fault pattern are broadly consistent with gravitational relaxation of a plateau boundary. Magnetic and gravity anomalies occur on either side of the buried fault. Admittance analysis indicates isostatic compensation. Although nonunique, a model with a 10 km thick intracrustal block under the lowland bench, a 20 km thick block under the plains, and an excess density of 200 kg/m 3 provides a good fit to the isostatic anomaly. A good fit to a profile of the magnetic field perpendicular to the dichotomy is produced using uniformly polarized intracrustal blocks 10–20 km thick, an intensity of 6 Am/m, a field inclination of −30°, and gaps aligned with the isostatic anomalies. One interpretation is that high‐density intrusions demagnetized the crust after dynamo cessation and that low‐lying magnetized areas could be down faulted highlands crust. Another model (inclination of 30°) has magnetized crust beneath the isostatic anomalies, separated by gaps. The gaps could result from hydrothermal alteration of the crust along fault zones.