Premium
Tidal perturbations and variability in the mesopause region over Fort Collins, CO (41N, 105W): Continuous multi‐day temperature and wind lidar observations
Author(s) -
She C. Y.,
Li Tao,
Collins Richard L.,
Yuan Tao,
Williams Bifford P.,
Kawahara Takuya D.,
Vance Joe D.,
Acott Phil,
Krueger David A.,
Liu HanLi,
Hagan Maura E.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/2004gl021165
Subject(s) - mesopause , amplitude , atmospheric tide , atmospheric sciences , zonal and meridional , gravity wave , tidal waves , wave model , perturbation (astronomy) , geology , lidar , thermosphere , climatology , mesosphere , geodesy , geophysics , meteorology , physics , stratosphere , gravitational wave , ionosphere , astrophysics , remote sensing , quantum mechanics
An unusually long data set was acquired at the sodium lidar facility at Colorado State University (41N, 105W), between Sep 18 and Oct 01, 2003, including a 9‐day continuous observation. This time is long enough to average out the perturbations of gravity waves and short‐period planetary waves. As such, it can be used to define tidal‐period perturbations in temperature and horizontal wind. Assuming the sodium mixing ratio is a constant of motion, the observed tidal‐period oscillation in sodium density follows that of vertical wind. Thus, the data set defines tidal‐period perturbations of temperature and wind vector. The observed amplitudes and phases were compared to Global Scale Wave Model predictions (both GSWM00 and GSWM02). We found excellent agreement in diurnal phases and reasonable agreement in semidiurnal phases. However, GSWM02 overestimates diurnal amplitudes and both model versions underestimate observed semidiurnal amplitudes. Since the data period is long enough for the study of planetary waves and of tidal variability, we perform spectral analysis of the data, revealing a strong quasi 3‐day wave in meridional wind, a 14 hour perturbation in zonal wind, and both 14‐hour and 10‐hour periods in meridional wind, likely the result of nonlinear interactions. The observed semidiurnal amplitudes are much larger than the corresponding diurnal amplitudes above 85 km, and over a few days the diurnal and semidiurnal amplitudes vary by factors of 2–3. Causes for the observed tidal variability in terms of planetary wave modulation and tide‐gravity wave interaction are explored qualitatively.