z-logo
Premium
Rupture process and near‐source shaking of the 1965 Seattle‐Tacoma and 2001 Nisqually, intraslab earthquakes
Author(s) -
Ichinose Gene A.,
Thio Hong Kie,
Somerville Paul G.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/2004gl019668
Subject(s) - hypocenter , seismology , geology , epicenter , slip (aerodynamics) , foreshock , peak ground acceleration , asperity (geotechnical engineering) , induced seismicity , seismic microzonation , intraplate earthquake , moment magnitude scale , earthquake shaking table , ground motion , aftershock , tectonics , geotechnical engineering , geometry , physics , mathematics , scaling , thermodynamics
We inverted teleseismic data for the 1965 Seattle‐Tacoma earthquake slip and rake. The earthquake had 2 asperities of 12 and 16 km 2 near the hypocenter with average slip of 2 and 2.8 m respectively (M o = 9.4 × 10 25 dyne‐cm; M w = 6.6). We also inverted strong‐motion and teleseismic data for the 2001 Nisqually earthquake. This earthquake had 2 subevents with an asperity area of 45 km 2 between 59 and 62 km depth with an average slip of 1.7 m (M o = 1.7 × 10 26 dyne‐cm; M w = 6.8). Shake‐maps of peak ground acceleration (PGA) and spectral acceleration (S a ) were generated using a time‐domain approach including slip model, site, and basin‐depth corrections based on California geology. Corrections reduced the residuals between observed and predicted PGA and S a . The simulated pattern of shaking from the 1965 earthquake was twice as high as in the 2001 earthquake due to the proximity of the 1965 epicenter to sedimentary basins.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here