Premium
Contrasting responses of forest ecosystems to rising atmospheric CO 2 : Implications for the global C cycle
Author(s) -
DeLucia E. H.,
Moore D. J.,
Norby R. J.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
global biogeochemical cycles
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.512
H-Index - 187
eISSN - 1944-9224
pISSN - 0886-6236
DOI - 10.1029/2004gb002346
Subject(s) - environmental science , ecosystem , carbon cycle , forest ecology , water cycle , terrestrial ecosystem , atmospheric sciences , earth science , ecology , geology , biology
In two parallel but independent experiments, Free Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) technology was used to expose plots within contrasting evergreen loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.) and deciduous sweetgum ( Liquidambar styraciflua L.) forests to the level of CO 2 anticipated in 2050. Net primary production (NPP) and net ecosystem production (NEP) increased in both forests. In the year 2000, after exposing pine and sweetgum to elevated CO 2 for approximately 5 and 3 years, a complete budget calculation revealed increases in net ecosystem production (NEP) of 41% and 44% in the pine forest and sweetgum forest, respectively, representing the storage of an additional 174 gC m −2 and 128 gC m −2 in these forests. The stimulation of NPP without corresponding increases in leaf area index or light absorption in either forest resulted in 23–27% stimulation in radiation‐use efficiency, defined as NPP per unit absorbed photosynthetically active radiation. Greater plant respiration contributed to lower NPP in the loblolly pine forest than in the sweetgum forest, and these forests responded differently to CO 2 enrichment. Where the pine forest added C primarily to long‐lived woody tissues, exposure to elevated CO 2 caused a large increase in the production of labile fine roots in the sweetgum forest. Greater allocation to more labile tissues may cause more rapid cycling of C back to the atmosphere in the sweetgum forest compared to the pine forest. Imbalances in the N cycle may reduce the response of these forests to experimental exposure to elevated CO 2 in the future, but even at the current stimulation observed for these forests, the effect of changes in land use on C sequestration are likely to be larger than the effect of CO 2 ‐induced growth stimulation.