z-logo
Premium
Evaluation of soil CO 2 production and transport in Duke Forest using a process‐based modeling approach
Author(s) -
Hui Dafeng,
Luo Yiqi
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
global biogeochemical cycles
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.512
H-Index - 187
eISSN - 1944-9224
pISSN - 0886-6236
DOI - 10.1029/2004gb002297
Subject(s) - soil respiration , environmental science , soil carbon , efflux , carbon cycle , respiration , biomass (ecology) , chemistry , soil water , water content , ecosystem , soil science , environmental chemistry , agronomy , ecology , botany , biology , geology , biochemistry , geotechnical engineering
Soil surface CO 2 efflux is an important component of the carbon cycle in terrestrial ecosystems. However, our understanding of mechanistic controls of soil CO 2 production and transport is greatly limited. A multilayer process‐based soil CO 2 efflux model (PATCIS) was used to evaluate soil CO 2 production and transport in the Duke Forest. CO 2 production in the soil is the sum of root respiration and soil microbial respiration, and CO 2 transport in the soil mainly simulates gaseous diffusion. Simulated soil CO 2 efflux in the Duke Forest ranged from 5 g CO 2 m −2 d −1 in the winter to 25 g CO 2 m −2 d −1 in summer. Annual soil CO 2 efflux was 997 and 1211 g C m −2 yr −1 in 1997 and 1998, respectively. These simulations were consistent with the observed soil CO 2 efflux. Simulated root respiration contributed 53% to total soil respiration. Soil temperature had the dominant influence on soil CO 2 production and CO 2 efflux while soil moisture only regulated soil CO 2 efflux in the summer when soil moisture was very low. Soil CO 2 efflux was sensitive to the specific fine root respiratory rate and live fine root biomass. Elevated CO 2 increased annual soil CO 2 efflux by 26% in 1997 and 18% in 1998, due mainly to the enhanced live fine root biomass and litterfall. On a daily to yearly basis, CO 2 production is almost identical to CO 2 efflux, suggesting that CO 2 transport is not a critical process regulating daily and long‐term soil surface CO 2 effluxes in the Duke Forest. We also developed a statistical model of soil CO 2 efflux with soil temperature and moisture. Daily soil CO 2 efflux estimation by the statistical model showed a similar pattern to the simulated soil CO 2 efflux, but the total annual CO 2 efflux was slightly lower. While the statistical model is simple, yet powerful, in simulating seasonal dynamics of soil CO 2 efflux, the process‐based model has the potential to advance our mechanistic understanding of soil CO 2 efflux variations in the current and future worlds.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom