Reply [to “Comment on ‘Communicating with uncertainty: A critical issue with probabilistic seismic hazard analysis’” by R. M. W. Musson] | Zendy

Wang Zhenming | Zendy; Shi Baoping | Zendy; Keifer John D. | Zendy; Woolery Edward W. | Zendy

Open Access

Reply [to “Comment on ‘Communicating with uncertainty: A critical issue with probabilistic seismic hazard analysis’” by R. M. W. Musson]

Author(s) -

Wang Zhenming,

Shi Baoping,

Keifer John D.,

Woolery Edward W.

Publication year - 2004

Publication title -

eos, transactions american geophysical union

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.316

H-Index - 86

eISSN - 2324-9250

pISSN - 0096-3941

DOI - 10.1029/2004eo240005

Subject(s) - probabilistic logic , hazard , seismic hazard , actuarial science , seismology , risk analysis (engineering) , computer science , econometrics , forensic engineering , geology , statistics , economics , engineering , mathematics , business , chemistry , organic chemistry

Musson's comments on our article are an example of myths and misunderstandings. We did not say that probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) is a bad method, but we did say that it has some limitations that have significant implications. Our response to these comments follows.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research