z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reply [to “Comment on ‘Righting the balance: Gender diversity in the geosciences’”] by Floyd Herbert
Author(s) -
Bell Robin,
Kane Mark,
Miller Roberta B.,
Mutter John C.,
Pfirman Stephanie,
Kastens Kim
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
eos, transactions american geophysical union
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.316
H-Index - 86
eISSN - 2324-9250
pISSN - 0096-3941
DOI - 10.1029/2004eo130005
Subject(s) - gender equity , gender balance , diversity (politics) , equity (law) , balance (ability) , women in science , gender diversity , gender equality , on board , sociology , political science , environmental ethics , law , psychology , gender studies , archaeology , management , geography , philosophy , economics , corporate governance , neuroscience
In our article “On Gender Equity in the Geosciences,” we are not advocating a quota of 50% women in the geosciences, but rather, suggesting that the field would be strengthened if all the individuals with doctorates in the geosciences (including the 28% of all Ph.D.s who are women) were to remain active in these fields [ National Science Board , 2002; Kastens , 2003]. Currently, only about 13% of employed Ph.D.s in these fields are women, which means that there is a considerable loss of trained scientists in the Earth, atmospheric, and oceanographic sciences. Even the entry‐level hires at Ph.D.‐granting institutions are only 20% female [ Holmes et al, 2003].

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom