z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Spectroscopic measurements of NO 2 in a Colorado thunderstorm: Determination of the mean production by cloud‐to‐ground lightning flashes
Author(s) -
Langford A. O.,
Portmann R. W.,
Daniel J. S.,
Miller H. L.,
Solomon S.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2003jd004158
Subject(s) - thunderstorm , lightning (connector) , lightning detection , meteorology , environmental science , mixing ratio , atmospheric sciences , atmospheric electricity , flash (photography) , geology , physics , optics , electric field , power (physics) , quantum mechanics
Ground‐based visible absorption spectroscopy of zenith‐scattered sky light was used to measure changes in the column abundance of NO 2 during the passage of a thunderstorm over Boulder, Colorado, on September 12, 2002. The measurements showed a 10‐fold rise in slant column NO 2 within the thunderstorm cell, consistent with an increase of about 7 ppbv in the lower core updrafts and main precipitation shaft. Mean mixing ratios of about 3 and 1.5 ppbv were inferred for the upper cell and anvil, respectively. These observations, together with measurements from the Denver NEXRAD and the Colorado State University (CSU) CHILL radars, and cloud‐to‐ground (CG) lightning flash data from the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN), are used to estimate the flash mean production of NO x by CG lightning. The measurements suggest a mean production rate of (5.8 ± 2.9) × 10 26 NO x molecules per CG flash, intermediate between the values derived from previous spectroscopic studies and in good agreement with the widely used value of 6.7 × 10 26 NO x molecules per CG flash estimated by Price et al. [1997]. This agreement may be fortuitous, however, since the lightning in the present study was about a factor of two less energetic than the mean assumed by Price et al. and the production of (2.3 ± 1.4) × 10 17 NO x /J inferred here is significantly larger than the value of 1 × 10 17 NO x /J assumed in their calculations. These differences can be reduced, however, if the estimates of Price et al. are recalculated using newer peak current data from the NLDN, and more recently published flash energy production rates of Wang et al. [1998].

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here