z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Analyzing earthquake clustering features by using stochastic reconstruction
Author(s) -
Zhuang Jiancang,
Ogata Yosihiko,
VereJones David
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2003jb002879
Subject(s) - aftershock , cluster analysis , event (particle physics) , magnitude (astronomy) , sequence (biology) , geology , seismology , statistical physics , computer science , physics , artificial intelligence , quantum mechanics , astronomy , biology , genetics
On the basis of the epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model and the thinning procedure, this paper gives the method about how to classify the earthquakes in a given catalogue into different clusters stochastically. The key points of this method are the probabilities of one event being triggered by another previous event and being a background event. Making use of these probabilities, we can reconstruct the functions associated with the characteristics of earthquake clusters to test a number of important hypotheses about the earthquake clustering phenomena. We applied this reconstruction method to the shallow seismic data in Japan and also to a simulated catalogue. The results show the following assertions: (1) The functions for each component in the formulation of the space‐time ETAS model are good enough as a first‐order approximation for describing earthquake clusters; (2) a background event triggers less offspring in expectation than a triggered event of the same magnitude; (3) the magnitude distribution of the triggered event depends on the magnitude of its direct ancestor; (4) the diffusion of the aftershock sequence is mainly caused by cascades of individual triggering processes, while no evidence shows that each individual triggering process is diffusive; and (5) the scale of the triggering region is still an exponential law, as formulated in the model but not the same one for the expected number of offspring.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here