z-logo
Premium
Partitioning net ecosystem carbon exchange into net assimilation and respiration with canopy‐scale isotopic measurements: An error propagation analysis with 13 CO 2 and CO 18 O data
Author(s) -
Ogée J.,
Peylin P.,
Cuntz M.,
Bariac T.,
Brunet Y.,
Berbigier P.,
Richard P.,
Ciais P.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
global biogeochemical cycles
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.512
H-Index - 187
eISSN - 1944-9224
pISSN - 0886-6236
DOI - 10.1029/2003gb002166
Subject(s) - disequilibrium , stable isotope ratio , isotopes of carbon , photosynthesis , ecosystem respiration , isotope , primary production , atmosphere (unit) , eddy covariance , carbon sink , flux (metallurgy) , atmospheric sciences , ecosystem , chemistry , environmental science , physics , ecology , meteorology , biology , biochemistry , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , medicine , ophthalmology
Stable CO 2 isotope measurements are increasingly used to partition the net CO 2 exchange between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere in terms of nonfoliar respiration ( F R ) and net photosynthesis ( F A ) in order to better understand the variations of this exchange. However, the accuracy of the partitioning strongly depends on the isotopic disequilibrium between these two gross fluxes, and a rigorous estimation of the errors on F A and F R is needed. In this study, we account for and propagate uncertainties on all terms in the mass balance and isotopic mass balance equations for CO 2 in order to get accurate estimates of the errors on F A and F R . We apply our method to a maritime pine forest in the southwest of France. Nighttime Keeling plots are used to estimate the 13 C and 18 O isotopic signature of F R (δ R ), and for both isotopes the a priori uncertainty associated with this term is estimated to be around 2‰ at our site. Using δ 13 C‐CO 2 and [CO 2 ] measurements, we then show that the uncertainty on instantaneous values of F A and F R can be as large as 4 μmol m −2 s −1 . Even if we could get more accurate estimates of the net CO 2 flux, the isoflux, and the isotopic signatures of F A and F R , this uncertainty would not be significantly reduced because the isotopic disequilibrium between F A and F R is too small, around 2–3‰. With δ 18 O‐CO 2 and [CO 2 ] measurements the uncertainty associated with the gross fluxes lies also around 4 μmol m −2 s −1 but could be dramatically reduced if we were able to get more accurate estimates of the CO 18 O isoflux and the associated discrimination during photosynthesis. This is because the isotopic disequilibrium between F A and F R is large, of the order of 12–17‰. The isotopic disequilibrium between F A and F R and the uncertainty on δ R vary among ecosystems and over the year. Our approach should help to choose the best strategy to study the carbon budget of a given ecosystem using stable isotopes.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom