Premium
Simulation of carbon isotope discrimination of the terrestrial biosphere
Author(s) -
Suits N. S.,
Denning A. S.,
Berry J. A.,
Still C. J.,
Kaduk J.,
Miller J. B.,
Baker I. T.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
global biogeochemical cycles
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.512
H-Index - 187
eISSN - 1944-9224
pISSN - 0886-6236
DOI - 10.1029/2003gb002141
Subject(s) - biome , biosphere , environmental science , atmospheric sciences , northern hemisphere , biosphere model , carbon cycle , isotopes of carbon , climatology , temperate climate , vegetation (pathology) , boreal , precipitation , vapour pressure deficit , normalized difference vegetation index , terrestrial ecosystem , taiga , photosynthesis , climate change , ecosystem , geology , transpiration , ecology , total organic carbon , meteorology , chemistry , geography , oceanography , biology , medicine , biochemistry , pathology
We introduce a multistage model of carbon isotope discrimination during C3 photosynthesis and global maps of C3/C4 plant ratios to an ecophysiological model of the terrestrial biosphere (SiB2) in order to predict the carbon isotope ratios of terrestrial plant carbon globally at a 1° resolution. The model is driven by observed meteorology from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), constrained by satellite‐derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and run for the years 1983–1993. Modeled mean annual C3 discrimination during this period is 19.2‰; total mean annual discrimination by the terrestrial biosphere (C3 and C4 plants) is 15.9‰. We test simulation results in three ways. First, we compare the modeled response of C3 discrimination to changes in physiological stress, including daily variations in vapor pressure deficit (vpd) and monthly variations in precipitation, to observed changes in discrimination inferred from Keeling plot intercepts. Second, we compare mean δ 13 C ratios from selected biomes (Broadleaf, Temperate Broadleaf, Temperate Conifer, and Boreal) to the observed values from Keeling plots at these biomes. Third, we compare simulated zonal δ 13 C ratios in the Northern Hemisphere (20°N to 60°N) to values predicted from high‐frequency variations in measured atmospheric CO 2 and δ 13 C from terrestrially dominated sites within the NOAA‐Globalview flask network. The modeled response to changes in vapor pressure deficit compares favorably to observations. Simulated discrimination in tropical forests of the Amazon basin is less sensitive to changes in monthly precipitation than is suggested by some observations. Mean model δ 13 C ratios for Broadleaf, Temperate Broadleaf, Temperate Conifer, and Boreal biomes compare well with the few measurements available; however, there is more variability in observations than in the simulation, and modeled δ 13 C values for tropical forests are heavy relative to observations. Simulated zonal δ 13 C ratios in the Northern Hemisphere capture patterns of zonal δ 13 C inferred from atmospheric measurements better than previous investigations. Finally, there is still a need for additional constraints to verify that carbon isotope models behave as expected.