
Rate constant for the reaction CH 3 + CH 3 → C 2 H 6 at T = 155 K and model calculation of the CH 3 abundance in the atmospheres of Saturn and Neptune
Author(s) -
Cody Regina J.,
Romani Paul N.,
Nesbitt Fred L.,
Ian Mark A.,
Tardy Dwight C.,
Stief Louis J.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: planets
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2002je002037
Subject(s) - neptune , reaction rate constant , saturn , analytical chemistry (journal) , extrapolation , physics , torr , astrophysics , planet , chemistry , thermodynamics , kinetics , mathematical analysis , mathematics , quantum mechanics , chromatography
The column abundances of CH 3 observed by the Infrared Space Observatory (ISO) satellite on Saturn and Neptune were lower than predicted by atmospheric photochemical models, especially for Saturn. It has been suggested that the models underestimated the loss of CH 3 due to poor knowledge of the rate constant k of the CH 3 + CH 3 self‐reaction at the low temperatures and pressures of these atmospheres. Motivated by this suggestion, we undertook a combined experimental and photochemical modeling study of the CH 3 + CH 3 reaction and its role in determining planetary CH 3 abundances. In a discharge flow‐mass spectrometer system, k was measured at T = 155 K and three pressures of He. The results in units of cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 are k(0.6 Torr) = 6.82 × 10 −11 , k(1.0 Torr) = 6.98 × 10 −11 , and k(1.5 Torr) = 6.91 × 10 −11 . Analytical expressions for k were derived that (1) are consistent with the present laboratory data at T = 155 K, our previous data at T = 202 K and 298 K, and those of other studies in He at T = 296–298 K and (2) have some theoretical basis to provide justification for extrapolation. The derived analytical expressions were then used in atmospheric photochemical models for both Saturn and Neptune. These model results reduced the disparity with observations of Saturn, but not with observations of Neptune. However, the disparity for Neptune is much smaller. The solution to the remaining excess CH 3 prediction in the models relative to the ISO observations lies, to a large extent, elsewhere in the CH 3 photochemistry or transport, not in the CH 3 + CH 3 rate.