z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Soil emissions of N 2 O, NO, and CO 2 in Brazilian Savannas: Effects of vegetation type, seasonality, and prescribed fires
Author(s) -
Pinto Alexandre de Siqueira,
Bustamante Mercedes M. C.,
Kisselle Keith,
Burke Roger,
Zepp Richard,
Viana Laura T.,
Varella Renato F.,
Molina Marirosa
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2001jd000342
Subject(s) - dry season , wet season , vegetation (pathology) , environmental science , seasonality , vegetation type , hydrology (agriculture) , atmospheric sciences , canopy , agronomy , ecology , grassland , geology , biology , geotechnical engineering , medicine , pathology
Using closed chamber techniques, soil fluxes of NO, N 2 O, and CO 2 were measured from September 1999 to November 2000 in savanna areas of central Brazil (cerrado) subjected to prescribed fires. Our studies focused on two vegetation types, cerrado stricto sensu (20–50% canopy cover) and campo sujo (open, grass dominated), which were either burned every 2 years or protected from fire. Soil moisture and vegetation type were more important in controlling NO and CO 2 fluxes than fire regime (early dry season, middle dry season or late dry season burning). N 2 O fluxes, however, were very low and below detection limit in any of the vegetation‐fire treatments. NO emissions increased after burning (1.0 ng NO–N cm −2 h −1 ), but flux returned quickly to prefire levels and even lower. In comparison, NO emissions increased 100‐fold (to 10.5 ng NO–N cm −2 h −1 ) during a water‐addition experiment in unburned campo sujo, and to 1.0 ng NO–N cm −2 h −1 in unburned cerrado and 1.9 ng NO–N cm −2 h −1 in burned cerrado with the first rains. Low NO and N 2 O emissions, low nitrification rates, and the majority of inorganic N in the form of NH 4 + all indicate a conservative N cycle in the cerrado. CO 2 fluxes increased with the onset of the rainy season and after artificial water addition. The highest CO 2 measured in the wet season was 6.3 μmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 in burned campo sujo. During the dry season, soil respiration in burned and unburned treatments were similar (average flux = 1.6–2.3 μmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 ). Differences between fire treatments of cerrado and campo sujo CO 2 fluxes are attributed to differences in relative litter production and root activity.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here